Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 03:08
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 692
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85E0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 44.3
38% 48.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 61.8
47% 56.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 146 63 14 75 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 506
Write 445
Mixed 414
SusWrite 123
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 48.6
52% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 92%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
285GB free
Firmware: 117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 398 428 453 449 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 480
Mixed 445
SusWrite 420
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56
203% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 320
241% 323 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 122%
Great: 313%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
240GB free
Firmware: A3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 91.3
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
674GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 88
Write 96.7
Mixed 85
SusWrite 76.6
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB
220GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 107 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 60
Write 58.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 108
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
201GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40% Average
Read 92
Write 89
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 96.5
104% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $239
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback