Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180723
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '20 at 11:00
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55 15,354 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 75 2-Core 144 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 230 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 4.19 4% 5.42 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 7.13 5% 6.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 129 46 79 31 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 293 Write 308 Mixed 235 SusWrite 88.5 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 21.5 72% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 53.2 74% 132 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 143GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 123 112 115 111 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 82 Write 71.5 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 116 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 390GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 114 Write 111 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 79 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 3,973 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-D R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	297x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	119x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	68x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	49x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 3,476 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16