Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '16 at 04:36
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 150
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 244
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus R9 380X
Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.4% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 68.5
42% 58.9 fps
MRender 53.9
Gravity 52
Splatting 44
40% 50 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
28GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 85.1
Write 80.1
Mixed 25
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 60%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
21GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 48
Mixed 11.7
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.34
96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 49%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 95.9
Mixed 33.3
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 15.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback