ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141031
Uptime	19 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '16 at 18:35
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 132 60% 96 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 383 39% 316 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.70 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 64 Parallax 57.4 50% 60.9 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 56.9 Splatting 51.6 48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199 9,250 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: X21100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3259 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1185 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 76 (A8) Unknown 100 100 130 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1775 (AB) Unknown 100 100 2 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 32 (AE) Unknown 100 100 57 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 7 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 74 36 154619543578 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 262 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16971 (F1) Unknown 253 253 9370 (F2) Unknown 253 253 14802 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	79.7% Very good	Read 504 Write 453 Mixed 472 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 15.5 95% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 16.2 36% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 114%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: 07.04C07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 161 4825 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7517 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4053 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4488 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 583 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7515 (C2) HDA temperature 121 95 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 64407561 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.4% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 100 Mixed 104 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.35 104% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 11GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897026236 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1844 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1192 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1844 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1844 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 158914314266 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.8% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 91.7 Mixed 104 73% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.18 65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3 2x8GB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 16.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback