Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core X 920-$90
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 131
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 266
29% 228 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 10.4
10% 10.6 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 9.17
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 60GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 73 71 67 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 224
Write 79
Mixed 120
SusWrite 71.3
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 21.2
73% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 90.2
68% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
55GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 71 68 64 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 66
Write 63.1
Mixed 45
SusWrite 68.4
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback