Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateDec 25 '16 at 11:17
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 74
2-Core 149
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 601
53% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,505
93% 1,505 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.8% Good
Lighting 96
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 33
78% 72.3 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 106
Splatting 55
48% 57.1 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 165
Write 177
Mixed 803
87% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 30.1
90% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 120
99% 134 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 186
Mixed 167
133% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.31
93% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
309GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 96.8
72% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.36
82% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
95GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 131
Write 26.5
Mixed 112
103% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 1.16
100% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 51.7
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 137%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback