HP ProBook 5330m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 5330m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 164F
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 19:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 74.3
39% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 107
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 164F) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 277
Write 162
Mixed 177
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 21.3
75% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 24.7
55% 110 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 86%
JMicron Generic 1TB
953GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 33.1
Write 27.6
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 25.1
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 6.6
477% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 5330m Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 5330m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback