Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 545
71% 535 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 2059) 2GB
CLim: 1002 MHz, MLim: 1036 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.52 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 6.48
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 309 311 310 311 309 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 432
Write 307
Mixed 280
SusWrite 309
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 22.4
93% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 135
113% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 320GB
230GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 198
Write 11.7
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 11.9
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3111 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 29.9
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 30.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback