Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 01:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 531
71% 531 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 2059) 2GB
CLim: 992 MHz, MLim: 1033 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.1
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 16.4
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 309 305 308 314 308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 424
Write 308
Mixed 276
SusWrite 308
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 22.2
92% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 135
113% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 320GB
296GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.7 5.2 4.7 5.6 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.2
6% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3111 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 29.9
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 32
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback