Medion Erazer X7847 MD60315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X7847 MD60315  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RP6-M
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160823
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 343
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6B02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 57.3
49% 62.3 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 69.1
54% 65.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C TLC
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 76 50 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 504
Write 442
Mixed 349
SusWrite 72.9
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 37.3
136% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 174
170% 271 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 90%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 388 392 408 407 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 374
Mixed 344
SusWrite 395
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 37.3
134% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 265
216% 308 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 123%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
263GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 79 78 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 65.1
Write 60.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 78.5
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback