ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion Erazer X7847 MD60315

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X7847 MD60315 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RP6-M
Memory	21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160823
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300HQ 41,531 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 189 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 360 48% 361 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 6B02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.2% Average	Lighting 60.5 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 48.6 49% 54.4 fps	MRender 17.9 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 69.7 34% 37.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C TLC 22 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 66 89 80 75 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 468 Write 438 Mixed 362 SusWrite 89.6 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 37.5 137% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 175 171% 271 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 90%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 111GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 412 416 423 447 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 420 Mixed 396 SusWrite 423 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 49.7 165% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 287 230% 323 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 263GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 62 62 62 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 59.7 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 62.5 39% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 24GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 19.5 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback