HP 320-1030

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP 320-1030  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACB
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '15 at 23:58
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 53
2-Core 107
36% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 213
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
HP(103C 2ACB) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 4.72
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.87
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 84.1
Mixed 105
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.44
101% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
30GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 31.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 25.6
38% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.28
4K Write 6.32
4K Mixed 2.75
328% 4.78 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 93%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB
15GB free, PID 0138
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 16.7
Mixed 12.1
20% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.01
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 1.59
144% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 14%
Typical 320-1030 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 320-1030

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback