Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180528
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 17:09
Run Duration	106 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 208 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 594 60% 484 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 88.8 Parallax 54.7 32% 60.8 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 76.6 Splatting 66.8 56% 68 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 73 95 97 107 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 92.3 60% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.2% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 19.6 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.9 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	148x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	131x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	55x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	79x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	32x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,735 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16