HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 06:24
Run Duration1063 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 756
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS820S 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 304 137 75 120 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 445
Write 14.1
Mixed 246
SusWrite 158
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 14.2
69% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 25.4
63% 130 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
88GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 65 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 48.9
Write 66.1
Mixed 51
SusWrite 65
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 71%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
74GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 169 171 169 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 102
SusWrite 170
202% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GF2.BA20B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback