Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 748
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 7.75
5% 8.12 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 14
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 52.1
46% 54.1 fps
MRender 44.1
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 49.8
40% 48.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 210
Mixed 324
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 37.2
143% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 199
173% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
427GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 68.2
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 98.7
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
261GB free
Firmware: AQ001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 84
Write 84.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 89.2
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
7.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 194 203 181 184 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 177
Write 187
Mixed 117
SusWrite 190
228% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2666 C16 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 30.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback