Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 431
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 18
12% 15.4 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 18.3
11% 13 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 74 77 82 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 7.3
Write 42.7
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 75.9
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGPP.BAC0B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback