Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '18 at 10:12
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 38.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 171
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 621
54% 463 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 16.2
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 10.9
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500DM002 500GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 79 49 89 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 93.5
Write 83
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 75.1
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGPP.BAC0B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback