Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 62.6 2-Core 124 53% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 198 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.7% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 56.6 Parallax 63.2 35% 54.3 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 48 Splatting 49.8 43% 52.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 236 38 76 76 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 434 Write 342 Mixed 355 SusWrite 96.1 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 32% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 47GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 100 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 128 Write 116 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 102 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1869DT 2x8GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.1% Below average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 15.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 11 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	59x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	37x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $75Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	8x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	9x
CT102464BD160 2x8GBCrucialBench 39%, 720 samples	9x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16