HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1496
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 04:58
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 450
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1496) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 156 151 155 153 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 398
Write 126
Mixed 164
SusWrite 145
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 18.5
70% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 76.4
66% 101 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 91%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 2TB
3TB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 25 25 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.5% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 21.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback