Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '20 at 04:59
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 86.1 1-Core 134 2-Core 266 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 787 82% 660 Pts	64-Core 738 46% 738 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 95.4 Reflection 98.2 Parallax 82.3 78% 91.9 fps	MRender 80.4 Gravity 82.8 Splatting 85.3 68% 82.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 421 437 442 446 428 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 478 Mixed 368 SusWrite 406 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 99.7 4K Mixed 53.2 182% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 337 263% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 205GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 499 315 314 314 314 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,525 Write 1,474 Mixed 1094 SusWrite 472 307% 1,391 MB/s	4K Read 64.7 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 88 307% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 970 DQ Write 1,089 DQ Mixed 273 415% 777 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 280%
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G1 80GB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 73GB free Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 62 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 63 Write 60.2 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 61.9 41% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 35%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 197 200 200 200 198 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 162 Mixed 30 SusWrite 198 97% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.9 351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 110%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 412GB free Firmware: 2BA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 99 99 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 105 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 98.5 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 350GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 36.2 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 35.8 46% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 42.5 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 39.5 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)