Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 00:59
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 293 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 834 89% 710 Pts	64-Core 1087 67% 1087 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.7% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 105 Parallax 99.6 82% 102 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 90.4 Splatting 91.5 74% 90.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 414 402 388 375 353 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 467 Mixed 362 SusWrite 390 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 53.3 182% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 337 260% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 205GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 314 313 313 313 313 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,468 Write 1,473 Mixed 1,092 SusWrite 486 305% 1,380 MB/s	4K Read 64.2 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 89.6 316% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 970 DQ Write 1,190 DQ Mixed 888 723% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 280%
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G1 80GB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 73GB free Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 62 61 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 58.3 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 62 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 35%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 199 197 197 197 199 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 90 Write 154 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 196 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.9 353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 110%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 404GB free Firmware: 2BA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 103 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 96.9 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 350GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 36 35 36 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 34 Write 33 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 36.5 45% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 38.6 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 37.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)