Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130803
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 176
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 329
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gainward(10B0 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 50
Parallax 73.3
45% 59.6 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 47.1
47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 91 86 91 94 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 153
Write 152
Mixed 105
SusWrite 86
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 109%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
61GB free
Firmware: VA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 55.4
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 54.3
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.2
138% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 36%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
170GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 36.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 40
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-8GK JM1333KLN-8GK 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback