TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM Node 1, Processor Card  (all builds)
Memory37.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 04:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 8870
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 99.3
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 128
60% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 508
45% 382 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 73.2%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 62.9
53% 66.5 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 58.4
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 52.8%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 119GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,598
Write 1,761
Mixed 1,690
377% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 62.4
224% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 231
175% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 167%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 213 211 210 215 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 201
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 212
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6M1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6M1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 36JSZF51272PY1G1D1 40GB
1600, 1600, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 39.7
101% 39.7 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback