Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 165
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 613
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 22
Parallax 18.3
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 25.1
21% 26 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
63GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 301 304 288 263 256 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 422
Mixed 413
SusWrite 298
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 36
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 362
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 59 68 74 82 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 69.5
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 32.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback