TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 131
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 377
36% 298 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 62.4%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.62
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.39
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.45%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 96 86 62 110 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 471
Write 373
Mixed 372
SusWrite 135
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 29.7
128% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 47.9
82% 159 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 75.3%
 Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
107GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 123
Mixed 61
SusWrite 134
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 73.9%
 Great: 74%
ADATA HV620 1TB
605GB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 112 113 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 88.5
Write 105
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 112
138% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.1
116% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 47.2%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1609U2 Kingston 9905403-439.A AE34G1609U2 Kingston 9905403-439.A 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 44.6%
 Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples572x
FX-8320AMD  $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples210x
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples110x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples61x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples46x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples35x
RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples82x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback