Biostar TPower I45

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TPower I45  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 21:17
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 98
50% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2 Serise 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 254
Write 211
Mixed 201
SusWrite 86.9
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 11.8
78% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 12
39% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 67%
Wd5003abyx-23 00W1135 00W1439IBM 500GB
303GB free
Firmware: WC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 104 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 104
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
402GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 84 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 77.9
Write 53.4
Mixed 28
SusWrite 80.6
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3500630A 500GB
193GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 55.6
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 42.9
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
115GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 109 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 121
Write 136
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 111
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
816GB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 102
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
14GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 4.9 4.8 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 13.9
Mixed 18
SusWrite 8.8
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
145% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TPower I45 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TPower I45

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback