Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1900 x 1068 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 161
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 372
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 35.9
28% 31.8 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 134 72 49 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 345
Write 180
Mixed 359
SusWrite 90.5
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 35.9
126% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 155
126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 156 156 157 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 30
SusWrite 156
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
266GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 97 100 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 7.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 98.2
40% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
465GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 75
Write 55
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 76.4
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL9-4GBXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 F3-17000CL9-4GBXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback