Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 149
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 487
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2362) 512MB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6
11% 9.54 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 9.26
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,626
Write 2,491
Mixed 2,530
639% 2,882 MB/s
4K Read 232
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 86.6
502% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 401
294% 383 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
84GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 67.1
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 70.7
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 63%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
55GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 202 202 202 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 212
Mixed 172
SusWrite 200
260% 184 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 23.7
1,764% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 28.1
2,347% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 150%
Great: 341%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
16GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 21 21 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 205
Write 36.1
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 22.2
84% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 5.9
411% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback