Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 17:33
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$75 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 158 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 483 47% 387 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 436 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 2362) 512MB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.87% Terrible	Lighting 13.7 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 5.97 11% 9.53 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 9.22 7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.87% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,758 Write 2,479 Mixed 2,541 648% 2,926 MB/s	4K Read 229 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 86.8 497% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 411 298% 386 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 84GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 71 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 68.2 Mixed 41 SusWrite 70.5 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 63%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 24 24 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 206 Write 30.9 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 24.8 84% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 5.9 441% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	5x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	4x

GPU
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	3x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	3x

RAM
9905402-174.A00G 9905402-174.A00G 99U5584-009.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 43%, 5 samples	3x
99U5471-004.A01LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 34%, 14 samples	3x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16