HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161014
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 21 '16 at 20:18
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 658
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4300 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 17.2
10% 17.7 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 12
Splatting 25.3
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,657
Write 894
Mixed 1,078
267% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 20.4
80% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 189
104% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 147%
Great: 237%
Kingston SUV400S37960G 960GB
543GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback