Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7350K-$42
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 216
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 368
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.69
6% 8.65 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 16
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0919A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 425 193 435 455 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 445
Mixed 319
SusWrite 396
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.5
181% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 198
174% 258 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 150 151 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 195
Mixed 109
SusWrite 151
114% 154 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
367% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB
173GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 33.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 4.2
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
173GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 32 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 33
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 32.5
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
117% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback