Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 09 '15 at 17:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 181
62% 137 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 181
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0)
Asus(1043 048D) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1018.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 40.9
27% 35.2 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 37
27% 32 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZTC-SM201-128G 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 495
Write 151
Mixed 231
64% 292 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 17.5
105% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 49.3
49% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 77%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
24GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 468
Write 328
Mixed 337
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 21.6
113% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 19.2
78% 175 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD15EARS-00Z5B1 1TB
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 160
Mixed 138
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.32
100% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 101
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.15
82% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 109%
Typical Z97E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $724
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback