Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3540M-$120 6,652 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 174 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 241 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 0534) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.26% Terrible	Lighting 4.77 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 3.28 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 2.67 Splatting 9.04 5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.26% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Yeston Extreme 240G 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 109 57 79 75 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.6% Good	Read 452 Write 407 Mixed 377 SusWrite 107 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 23.9 100% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 46.8 97% 193 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	981x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	160x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	31x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28