Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 05:26
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 752
70% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.2
29% 35.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 37.7
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,850
Write 1,115
Mixed 471
250% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 52.8
180% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 534
440% 637 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
JMicron H/W RAID1 3TB
112GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 32 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32
Write 31.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 33.2
41% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 62%
Multi-Reader -0 32GB
20GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 70.5
Mixed 37.7
86% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
124% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 48%
Multi-Reader -3 32GB
16GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 62 62 62 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 54.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 61
76% 60 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.8
255% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 42%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
2TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 143 143 141 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 145
Mixed 114
SusWrite 142
184% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 71%
JMicron H/W RAID1 6TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 126 123 126 127 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 123
163% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
99% 1.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback