Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '20 at 18:54
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 215 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 708 70% 573 Pts	64-Core 945 58% 945 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.5% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 59.6 50% 62.3 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 51.7 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 211 205 199 201 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 477 Write 248 Mixed 247 SusWrite 212 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 12.4 55% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 88.3 96% 164 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 105%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 10GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 91 131 122 100 87 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 47.7 Write 9.8 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 96 11% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 16.8 60% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 48.9 65% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 85%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 136 136 134 135 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 147 Write 142 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 135 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 100%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 162 161 162 162 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 160 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 142 141 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 81.2 Mixed 73 SusWrite 140 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 96 95 94 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 68.5 Write 58.8 Mixed 66 SusWrite 93.4 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 516GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 89 90 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 90 Write 48.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 88.6 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2800 2OZ Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 DDR4 2800 2OZ Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 DDR4 2800 2OZ Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 DDR4 2800 2OZ Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	MC Read 43.5 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 43.4 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 21.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	839x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	285x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $115Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $700

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16