MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2OC/2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 14:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 544
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 7.22
4% 6.3 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.65
6% 6.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 500GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 306 285 269 269 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 59.9
Mixed 309
SusWrite 270
112% 519 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 31.1
120% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 274
223% 326 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 126%
Great: 207%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
90GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 22 37 37 39 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 164
Write 74.7
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 40.7
100% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
127% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 0420 MIF4D1D167HZ1 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 0420 MIF4D1D167HZ1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback