ADD TO PC
BUILD

Punch LDT-703-1017

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Punch LDT-703-1017 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 09:52
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 133 2-Core 255 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 708 72% 582 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7A15) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Lighting 8.13 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 8.41 7% 9.36 fps	MRender 8.43 Gravity 7.37 Splatting 15.8 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
DAS TerraMaster 5TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 91 91 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 75 Write 112 Mixed 84 SusWrite 90.4 20% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.8 7% 3.43 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 6.2 DQ Mixed 1.9 2% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16N2 1x8GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 10.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback