Asus CM6870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 23:03
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 188 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 514 53% 425 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8431) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.89% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 11.9 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 13 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.89% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 696GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 136 157 134 138 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 148 Write 166 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 140 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 107%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 106GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 60 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 50.2 Mixed 41 SusWrite 59.8 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 49%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 6.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 28 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 27.4 39% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	508x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	22x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16