Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 21:45
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 113
57% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 424
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1687 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 24.7
21% 23.6 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 20.5
21% 26 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 78 76 65 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 366
Write 81
Mixed 107
SusWrite 69.3
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 10.1
70% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 7.2
28% 63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 91%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
133GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 133 137 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 154
Write 136
Mixed 102
SusWrite 132
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 24.3
82% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 34.8
28% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
49GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 78.8
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 97
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 114%
Maxone USB 3.0 500GB
332GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 89
Write 91
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 92.3
110% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $527
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback