Asus P7H55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100724
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 20:51
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 128 60% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 343 35% 284 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 40.6 31% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 34.8 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 128 104 50 92 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 194 Write 195 Mixed 123 SusWrite 105 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 25.5 87% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 35 30% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 88%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 82 90 91 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 78.8 Write 78.3 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 85.7 51% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 77%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$46 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 546GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 125 124 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 138 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 124 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 846GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 59 64 74 79 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 80 Write 78 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 67.6 49% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 75%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-22HXZT1 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 259GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 43 43 51 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	Read 14.3 Write 12.5 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 43.1 29% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 14%
ST975042 3AS 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 392GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.4 6.3 6 7.6 6.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.07% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 21 Mixed 13 SusWrite 6.5 19% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.8 6.2 5.9 4.5 2.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Read 10.3 Write 6.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.2 8% 6.65 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-USB3 Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	33x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	32x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $129Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	4x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	3x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	32x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	32x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16