Asus P8H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110225
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 99.2
42% 70 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 148
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
XFX(1682 304E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.56
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 29 34 35 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 25
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 30.7
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.1 4 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 2.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.9
6% 5.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback