User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemUnknow Unknow
MotherboardnVIDIA NF-MCP61
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '16 at 19:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X2 215
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 86.5
43% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 85.8
12% 87.3 Pts
64-Core 89.3
6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.31
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 0.09
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 92.8
Mixed 93.2
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
293GB free
Firmware: 15.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 99
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.27
85% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback