Samsung 700Z7C

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Samsung 700Z7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '16 at 10:12
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 123 55% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 319 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0CC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 3.06 4% 4.99 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.39 5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.8.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 132257661 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 -100416335345881 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 441 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 274 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 54 68723015718 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 132257661 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 132257661 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 132257661 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 121074 (EA) Unknown 0 0 118403 (F1) Unknown 0 0 118403 (F2) Unknown 0 0 128164	60.8% Good	Read 479 Write 263 Mixed 290 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 16.4 64% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 57.7 63% 109 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 69%
Sandisk i100 8GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1GB free Firmware: 11.00.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24224 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1356 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 29 (AE) Unknown 100 100 541 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 96 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 48 (F1) Unknown 100 100 18410220 (F2) Unknown 100 100 40127121	14.7% Very poor	Read 115 Write 28.7 Mixed 42.4 13% 62 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 3.37 30% 7.66 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 17%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 122 Write 111 Mixed 86.6 133% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 6.57 4K Mixed 0.56 246% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 84%
WDC WD30 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 568GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 108 Write 107 Mixed 96.2 133% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.32 94% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 66%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 85GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 167 Write 70.7 Mixed 61.3 108% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 6.37 4K Mixed 0.28 230% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 84%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 53GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 87.9 127% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.23 57% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 49%
WDC WD30 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 17GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 175 Write 109 Mixed 110 156% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 0.34 109% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 029E CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 12GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 6.4 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700Z7C Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z7C

CPU
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	30x
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	40x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Blue 500GBWD $87Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 96 samples	14x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 740 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 289 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16