Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 143
59% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 476
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 72.6
41% 62 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 53.5
46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F500S 128G 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 433 435 125 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 486
Write 428
Mixed 408
SusWrite 270
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 26.2
124% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 42.8
92% 183 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 146 36 60 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 139
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 114
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
271GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 104 102 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 180
Write 132
Mixed 71
SusWrite 103
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MSD48G26Q3 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback