Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 04:23
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 223
86% 148 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 659
71% 565 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 100
81% 102 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 83.5
Splatting 80.4
77% 97.1 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 411 443 335 429 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,541
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 480
294% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 68.2
226% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 948
761% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 212%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 25.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback