Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 82
2-Core 129
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 210
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.87
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.69
4% 5.18 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.86 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 208 202 206 203 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.2% Good
Read 254
Write 244
Mixed 221
SusWrite 210
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 33
110% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 195
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
316GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 116 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback