Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime13 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 911
85% 709 Pts
64-Core 1366
84% 1366 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 55
Parallax 44.6
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.1
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,287
Write 1,730
Mixed 1,390
399% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 60.5
215% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,134
847% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
452GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 386 390 407 379 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 411
Mixed 363
SusWrite 392
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 46.7
154% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 203
153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
25GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 131 122 110 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 83
SusWrite 123
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
202GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 84 82 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 84
SusWrite 82.9
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$241
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 32.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 26.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback