bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 18:01
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 142
57% 96 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 193
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 5.78
6% 6.59 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.54 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 41 89 54 20 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 94.3
Write 70.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 55.6
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.8
6% 4.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3032382E4130304C4620 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback