MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7752
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130929
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 18:00
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 378
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 8420) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 44.6
29% 38.7 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 43
Splatting 30.4
30% 38.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,260
Write 4,748
Mixed 4,901
1,109% 4,970 MB/s
4K Read 323
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 200
838% 233 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 936
706% 952 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
337GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 999 625 624 624 624 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1,847
Mixed 1,335
SusWrite 865
340% 1,519 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 63.7
197% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,087
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 932
701% 942 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 238%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 132
Mixed 26
SusWrite 150
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 107%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
298GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 89.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 94
111% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 111
Write 93.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 112
112% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 39%
USB 3.0 MassStorage 3TB
1TB free, PID 5002
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 137 138 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 144
Write 128
Mixed 26
SusWrite 136
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 1600 C7 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G45 (MS-7752) Builds (Compare 1,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback