Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 06:22
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 65.9 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 149 57% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 587 52% 443 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 30.9 27% 34 fps	MRender 47.1 Gravity 33 Splatting 43 34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 1530 1523 1548 1513 1513 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 2,077 Write 1,804 Mixed 1,178 SusWrite 1,515 368% 1,644 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 62.4 205% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 768 DQ Write 526 DQ Mixed 656 487% 650 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 613GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 387 390 389 388 389 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 444 Mixed 427 SusWrite 386 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 45.4 148% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 389GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 98 88 97 96 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 138 Write 150 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 95.5 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.8 221% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 8x8GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 26 MC Write 44.9 MC Mixed 26.4 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 7.8 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 170%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 112%

UFO

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	51x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	45x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	22x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	18x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	18x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16